Cyber Pulse Academy

Identity Dark Matter

The Hidden Cybersecurity Menace You Must Uncover Explained Simply


In the ever-evolving landscape of cyber threats, a new wave of attacks is targeting cryptocurrency users through a trusted vector: the browser extension. Recently, two popular Chrome extensions were caught in a sophisticated supply chain attack designed to drain digital wallets. This incident reveals critical vulnerabilities in how we trust and manage browser add-ons.


For cybersecurity professionals and beginners alike, understanding this attack vector is crucial. This post will dissect the malware incident, map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, and provide actionable defense strategies from both Red and Blue Team perspectives. By the end, you'll know exactly how these malicious Chrome extensions operate and how to build an effective defense.


Table of Contents


Executive Summary: The Supply Chain Breach

The attack centered on two Chrome extensions: "Aggr" and "Raygun", which were marketed as tools for tracking cryptocurrency prices and portfolio management. Unbeknownst to users, the extensions were compromised in a supply chain attack, where the legitimate developer's account or update mechanism was hijacked.


The malicious update injected code designed to intercept cryptocurrency transactions. When a user attempted to send funds via a connected wallet like MetaMask, the extension would secretly replace the recipient's wallet address with one controlled by the threat actor. The user would authorize the transaction, unknowingly sending their assets directly to the attacker.


White Label 499ec507 16. malicious chrome

Attack Breakdown: How the Malicious Chrome Extensions Worked

The technical sophistication of this attack lies in its subtlety. The extensions maintained their original functionality (price tracking) while adding a clandestine malicious payload. Here's a deeper look at the malicious behavior:

The JavaScript Injection Technique

The core malware operated by injecting a script into every webpage the user visited. This script specifically listened for web3 API calls, the communication layer used by cryptocurrency wallets like MetaMask to interact with decentralized applications (dApps).


When a transaction was initiated, the malicious code would hook into the eth_sendTransaction JSON-RPC method. It would then parse the transaction object, identify the target to address, and replace it with an address hardcoded into the malicious extension. The user's wallet would then sign this modified transaction, believing it was sending funds to the intended recipient.

Example of Malicious Intercept Logic (Simplified)

The following pseudo-code illustrates the hooking mechanism. The actual obfuscated code was more complex.


// Malicious extension background script injects a content script
chrome.tabs.onUpdated.addListener((tabId, changeInfo, tab) => {
    if (changeInfo.status === 'complete') {
        chrome.scripting.executeScript({
            target: { tabId: tabId },
            function: injectMaliciousHook
        });
    }
});

function injectMaliciousHook() {
    // Override the web3 provider's send method
    const originalSend = window.ethereum.send.bind(window.ethereum);
    window.ethereum.send = function(method, params) {
        if (method === 'eth_sendTransaction') {
            // ATTACKER'S WALLET ADDRESS
            const attackerAddress = '0xAttackerWalletHashHere';
            // Replace the 'to' parameter in the first transaction
            if (params && params[0]) {
                params[0].to = attackerAddress;
            }
        }
        // Proceed with the modified transaction
        return originalSend(method, params);
    };
}

Key Point: This code runs with the same permissions as the webpage, allowing it to silently manipulate financial transactions without triggering obvious warnings to the user.


MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: Mapping the Adversary Playbook

Understanding this incident through the MITRE ATT&CK framework helps defenders anticipate and detect similar attacks. Here are the primary tactics and techniques employed:


Tactic Technique ID & Name How It Was Used
Initial Access T1556.002: Compromise Software Supply Chain The attacker compromised the extension developer's account or update server to push malicious updates to trusted software.
Execution T1059.005: JavaScript/JScript Malicious JavaScript was delivered via the extension's content scripts and executed in the context of visited web pages.
Persistence T1176: Browser Extensions The malicious extension persists across browser restarts and maintains a presence to intercept transactions.
Defense Evasion T1036: Masquerading The extension masqueraded as a legitimate, useful cryptocurrency tool to avoid user suspicion.
Credential Access T1555.003: Credentials from Web Browsers While not stealing passwords, it intercepted and manipulated session data (transaction signatures) which are cryptographic credentials.
Impact T1657: Financial Theft The primary impact was the theft of cryptocurrency funds from users' wallets.

Step-by-Step: The Anatomy of a Crypto Extension Hijack

Step 1: Compromise the Supply Chain

The threat actor gains control of the extension developer's Chrome Web Store account, either through phishing, credential theft, or exploiting a vulnerability in the developer's systems. This allows them to submit a malicious update.

Step 2: Push the Malicious Update

A new version of the extension is published. The update includes obfuscated JavaScript designed to hook into browser APIs related to cryptocurrency transactions. The update notes appear normal, encouraging users to auto-update.

Step 3: Silent Injection & Monitoring

Once installed/updated, the extension injects a content script into all pages (or specific finance/crypto pages). This script monitors for the initialization of web3 providers (like window.ethereum).

Step 4: Transaction Interception

When a user initiates a transaction on a dApp, the malicious script intercepts the call to eth_sendTransaction. It modifies the transaction parameters, swapping the destination address for the attacker's address.

Step 5: Fraudulent Execution

The user's wallet (e.g., MetaMask) prompts for signature approval. The user sees the correct amount but cannot easily verify the altered hexadecimal address. Upon approval, funds are irreversibly sent to the attacker.


Red Team vs. Blue Team: Attacker Mindset vs. Defender Strategy

Red Team (Threat Actor) Perspective

  • Objective: Financial gain via cryptocurrency theft.
  • Targeting: Choose extensions with broad install bases in the crypto niche. Prioritize those with infrequent updates or solo developers.
  • Initial Access: Phish developer credentials or exploit weak 2FA on their Google/developer accounts.
  • Payload Design: Obfuscate malicious JavaScript to bypass automated Chrome Web Store scans. Maintain core functionality to avoid user reports.
  • Evasion: Use domain fronting or dynamic configuration to pull attacker wallet addresses from a C2 server, making static analysis harder.
  • Monetization: Use cryptocurrency tumblers or instant exchanges to cash out stolen funds quickly.

Blue Team (Defender) Perspective

  • Detection: Monitor for anomalous network requests from extensions. Look for extensions making calls to unknown domains or modifying web3 RPC calls.
  • Hardening: Implement least-privilege principles for extensions. Use dedicated browser profiles: one for financial activities (with minimal extensions) and one for general browsing.
  • User Training: Educate users to scrutinize extension permissions and update notes. Encourage the use of browser-native features over third-party extensions where possible.
  • Technical Controls: Deploy endpoint security that can detect behavioral anomalies in browser processes, such as hooking into sensitive JavaScript APIs.
  • Incident Response: Have a plan to quickly identify compromised extensions via threat intelligence feeds and communicate the risk to organizational users to remove them immediately.
  • Verification: Use hardware wallets for high-value transactions, as they require physical confirmation on the device, which malicious JavaScript cannot manipulate.

Common Mistakes & Best Practices for Extension Security

Common User & Organizational Mistakes

  • Over-trusting the Chrome Web Store: Assuming the store's automated review is a guarantee of security.
  • Ignoring Permission Requests: Granting extensions overly broad permissions like "Read and change all your data on all websites".
  • Using a Single Browser Profile: Conducting high-risk activities (banking, crypto) in the same profile where you test random extensions.
  • Disabling Auto-Updates: While sometimes prudent, this can also prevent receiving critical security patches for legitimate extensions.
  • No Inventory Management: Organizations often have no visibility into which browser extensions their employees are using.

Best Practices for Defense

  • Principle of Least Privilege: Review and restrict extension permissions. Use the Chrome 'Details' page to see what site data an extension can access.
  • Browser Segmentation: Create separate secure browser profiles or even use a different browser entirely for sensitive financial transactions.
  • Vet Extensions Rigorously: Check reviews, developer details, update history, and privacy policies. Prefer extensions from well-known companies or open-source projects with active communities.
  • Employ Browser Security Tools: Use extensions like uBlock Origin (in advanced mode) to block scripts and NoScript to control JavaScript execution.
  • Enable Enhanced Protection in Chrome: Turn on "Enhanced protection" in Chrome Safety Check (Settings > Privacy and security > Security). This uses real-time threat intelligence to warn about dangerous extensions.
  • For Organizations: Use Group Policy or MDM solutions to whitelist approved extensions only. Regularly audit this list.

Defense Implementation Framework

Implement a layered defense strategy using the following framework:


White Label 7584b3b1 16. malicious chrome

1. Prevention Layer

  • Policy: Establish and enforce an approved extension whitelist.
  • Technical: Configure devices to only allow installation from the enterprise admin console.
  • Education: Train users on the risks of third-party extensions and how to verify legitimacy.

2. Detection Layer

  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Deploy EDR solutions capable of detecting suspicious browser process behavior, such as code injection into other processes.
  • Network Monitoring: Monitor for DNS requests or connections to known malicious domains from browser processes. Use feeds from URLhaus or AlienVault OTX.
  • Browser Logging: For advanced environments, consider centralizing browser security event logs.

3. Response & Recovery Layer

  • Containment: Have scripts or MDM commands ready to remotely disable or uninstall a compromised extension across the enterprise.
  • Communication: Quickly inform users of the threat and provide clear remediation steps.
  • Post-Incident Analysis: Analyze the malicious extension's code and network indicators to update detection rules and blocklists.

Further Reading & External Resources:


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: How can I check if an extension I've installed is malicious?

A: Review its permissions in chrome://extensions/. Check its reviews and recent update notes for complaints. Use a tool like Extensions Update Notifier to monitor changes. If you're technical, you can manually inspect its activities in the browser's Developer Tools under the "Background page" section.

Q: Are other browsers like Firefox or Edge vulnerable to similar attacks?

A: Yes. While this article focuses on malicious Chrome extensions, the add-on ecosystems for Firefox, Edge, and other browsers are similarly vulnerable to supply chain attacks. The same defensive principles apply across platforms.

Q: What's the single most effective protection for crypto users?

A: Using a hardware wallet (like Ledger or Trezor) for signing transactions. The transaction details are displayed and confirmed on the physical device itself, which malicious browser JavaScript cannot tamper with.

Q: Can antivirus software detect these malicious extensions?

A: Traditional signature-based antivirus may miss them, especially if the code is new or obfuscated. Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and EDR solutions that use behavioral detection (looking for actions like hooking web3 APIs) have a better chance. Always keep your security software updated.


Key Takeaways

  • Browser extensions are powerful but risky, they have deep access to your browsing data and can manipulate web page content.
  • The recent supply chain attack on crypto extensions demonstrates that even trusted software can become malicious overnight via compromised updates.
  • The attack leverages MITRE ATT&CK techniques like Supply Chain Compromise (T1556.002) and Browser Extensions (T1176) for persistence and execution.
  • Defense requires a layered approach: user education, strict permission management, browser segmentation, technical controls, and proactive monitoring.
  • For high-value activities like cryptocurrency management, isolated environments and hardware wallets are non-negotiable security measures.
  • Organizations must treat browser extensions as part of their official software inventory and manage them with the same rigor as other applications.

Call-to-Action: Secure Your Browser Today

Don't wait until you become a victim. Take these three actions right now:


Action 1: Audit Your Extensions

Open chrome://extensions/ and critically review every installed extension. Ask: Do I still use this? Are the permissions necessary? Remove anything non-essential.

Action 2: Create a Secure Profile

In Chrome, create a new profile named "Financial" or "Secure". Install ONLY the absolute minimum extensions needed for banking or crypto (e.g., only the official wallet extension). Use this profile exclusively for those sensitive activities.

Action 3: Strengthen Your Habits

Enable Enhanced Protection in Chrome Security settings. Always double-check the recipient address in your crypto wallet before signing, especially the first and last few characters. Consider copying and pasting addresses from multiple sources to verify.


Cybersecurity is a continuous process. Stay informed, stay skeptical, and layer your defenses.
Bookmark this page and share it with your colleagues to help build a more secure digital environment for everyone.

© 2026 Cyber Pulse Academy. This content is provided for educational purposes only.

Always consult with security professionals for organization-specific guidance.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ask ChatGPT
Set ChatGPT API key
Find your Secret API key in your ChatGPT User settings and paste it here to connect ChatGPT with your Courses LMS website.
Certification Courses
Hands-On Labs
Threat Intelligence
Latest Cyber News
MITRE ATT&CK Breakdown
All Cyber Keywords

Every contribution moves us closer to our goal: making world-class cybersecurity education accessible to ALL.

Choose the amount of donation by yourself.